How much money did Bala got?

If Saiful is accused of being a planted mole of Najib, and he was paid and forced to lodge a police report against Anwar Ibrahim, is there a possibility Bala being paid to come out with this statutory declaration.

What i’m looking forward to is Anwar’s statutory declaration (preferably before the Quran) saying that he’s not in the condominium on the 26th of June 2008. I want Anwar to pull his pants up and come out with an alibi. He delayed! And he instead didn’t deny of him being in the apartment.

Instead, I get another Statutory Declaration based on hearsay, a lot of hearsay. Ok, you get a lot in terms of entertainment value. But the only thing this RM4 Statutory Declaration tells me is I’d got to be careful who I hire as Private Investigator. – Rockybru

Speaking of diversion, who are diverting now? If Najib is guilty does that make Anwar a free guy? Even if this two cases are interconnected, it’s only at technical level. These two cases must be seen and treated independently of each other. Why dodge? Why divert? Drama Queen!

I’m disgusted!

Malaysiakini – Najib dituduh bersama Altantuya

*************************************************************************

Below is the full statutory declaration, copied and pasted from rockybru’s blog

THE STATUTORY DECLARATION

I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: xxxxxx-xx-6235) a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at xxxxx, Selangor do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.

2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.

3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.

4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.
5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.

6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.

7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.

8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.

9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.

10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.

11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.

13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.
14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.
15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.

16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.

17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.
18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.
19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.
20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.
21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.

23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.

24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-
25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.
25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.
25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.
25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.

25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.

26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.

27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.
28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-
28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.
28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.
28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.
28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.
28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.
28.6That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.
28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.

30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.

31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.

32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.
33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.

34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.

35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.

36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.

37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.

38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 – 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.

39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.

40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.

41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.

42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.

43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.

44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.

45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.

46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.
47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.

48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.
49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.
50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- ” I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.

53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.

54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-
54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.
54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.

54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

SUBCRIBED and solemnly )

declared by the abovenamed )

Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal ]

this day of 2008 )
Before me,

………………………………….
Commissioner for Oath
Kuala Lumpur

Advertisements

9 responses to “How much money did Bala got?

  1. i don’t trust anwar ibrahim, he’s the man who will do almost everything to achieve his goal. He had set his sight on PM’s seat. It’s his personal interest nothing to do with Malaysians.

  2. Berapa banyak yang Saiful dapat?
    Kami dah muak dengan derama ulang tayang tahun 98. Semua tidak menyakin kami.
    Wahai PM berikan lah kepada kami sedikit kerpercayaan kepada kerajaan dan PULIHKAN segala bentuk penyelewengan, badan kehakimaN ,POLIS DAN PENDAWARAYA SENDIRI agar kami rakyat bertambah yakin akan ketelusan kerajaan menangani apa juga MASAALAH RAKYAT.
    Jangan sesekali mengaibkan sesama manusia, kita diajar supaya mengikuti ajaran islam.Dimanakah letaknya maruah kalian, kita umat islam diketawakan oleh mereka yang benci akan islam.
    Marilah kembali kepadanya. Unuk Saiful bertaubatlah.

  3. Back to square one lah, how much money saiful dapat? then i can also ask you how much money bala dapat? I can also tell that i have been reliably informed that anwar has got loads of money outside the country. Enough la to pay bala. But i chose not to because i think we are not going anywhere if we keep on guessing how much money did they all get for this revelation.

    Face the accusations with proofs to counter that specific police report. What’s the purpose of diverting this case to altantuya’s the issue is did anwar sodomized saiful or not?.

    I’m not interested in anwar’s ambition or najib’s one step in PM’s seat, i am worried with our country’s future. If anwar think he’s doing the right thing for the country, mind me telling this, he’s just like ‘tikus membaiki labu’.

  4. bala, bala, kenapa lah engkau termakan kata-kata anwar tu.

    anwar,anwar kenapa lah engkau tak jawab sahaja tuduhan liwat tu, kang dah jadi keliru. Elok-elok orang ingat engkau tak buat

  5. Before we ask how much was Bala paid, one needs to answer a simple question: If Najib believes that he has been defamed, why not lodge a police report? Defamation is a crime, if you are innocent, why not sue him? What are you waiting for. Him saying something or writing SD is nothing at all, Najib’s response is what matters.

    That said, what did Najib say on Monday at Parliament? That he “has never met, seen, talked to or come acrossSaiful.” Well, what did Najib say today while sweating?

    DPM admits meeting sodomy complainant

    Beh Lih Yi | Jul 3, 08 9:49pm
    In a new twist, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Abdul Razak today admitted that he met Saiful Bukhari Azlan a few days before the latter lodged a police report against Anwar Ibrahim for alleged sodomy.

    http://www.malaysiakini.com/news/85547

    “Malaysia’s deputy prime minister said on Thursday the man who has accused opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim of sodomy had turned to him for help because he was in a trauma.

    Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak’s surprise remarks came days after Anwar rejected the allegation as a top-level conspiracy to prevent him from standing for parliament and stymie his drive to woo defectors from the ruling coalition.

    Police are investigating Anwar, 60, for allegedly sodomising his 23-year-old aide. A similar charge a decade ago landed the former finance minister in jail for six years before the nation’s highest court overturned that conviction in 2004.

    Najib said Anwar’s accuser, Saiful Bukhari Azlan, went to his house a few days before lodging the police report on Saturday.

    “There is no conspiracy. The boy came to my house to complain to me that he was sodomised by Anwar. Initially I was skeptical. He needed help because he was so traumatized,” Najib told reporters.

    “It was up to him and the police to decide on the next course of action.”

    http://www.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idUSKLR29440520080703?sp=true

    Najib denied links with Saiful but today admitted that he has met Saiful at his house few days ago…”

    http://themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/home/42-lead-stories/1367-najib-never-met-altantuya-but-saw-qtraumatisedq-saiful

    How will you defend that? You think we are toddlers or what? It is not a question od personalities, it is a matter of certain elements thinking that they can manipulate all people, may be they see few dimwits and buffoons who pussyfoot them and they mistakenly imagine that Malaysians are all such marauding pussyfooters. The DPM denied that he has met, dined, ate or talked to Saiful, today he has admitted that he has been meeting him recently. Well, you don’t need to wait longer for him to self destruct before his competitors come for him.

  6. in that case abdul, if it’s true najib is the worst conspirator ever live.. hehe

  7. Ruzaimi,

    Secara bodoh perlu kita perbincangkan perkara pokok. Apa kaitan siapa bayar siapa….siapa dapat berapa…? Kenapa kamu perlu pertikaikan perkara yang langsung tidak berkaitan? Kenapa kamu perlu pertahankan Najib walaupun sudah kelihatan ada kaitan langsung antara Najib dengan Altantuya? Kamu terlalu taksub dengan Najib sehinggakan sanggup memaafkan dosa-dosa Najib. Sedangkan Najib sendiri gagal untuk pertahankan diri sendiri, kamu pulak terlebih-lebih. Najib tunggu masa sahaja untuk meletakkan jawatan. Beliau terpaksa menafikan dalam terpaksa. Dua SD sudah cukup membuatkan Najib tertiarap. Tapi…sememangnya sifat UMNO macam tu, beliau tetap akan menafikan selagi mampu.

    Sama lah macam kamu. Asalkan mampu untuk mengampu….kamu tetap mengampu sehinggalah terbukti sesuatu. Baru la nak mengaku…itupun mengaku secara tak ikhlas…dalam hati masih lagi kata kamu yang benar walaupun satu dunia tahu ianya salah.

    Aku kesian kat kamu….otak letak kat lutut!!!

  8. dalam komentar balas saya yang pertama dalam artikel ini, saya petik…

    “Back to square one lah, how much money saiful dapat? then i can also ask you how much money bala dapat? I can also tell that i have been reliably informed that anwar has got loads of money outside the country. Enough la to pay bala. But i chose not to because i think we are not going anywhere if we keep on guessing how much money did they all get for this revelation.”

    jika uncrowded baca ayat terakhir… ” i chose not to because i think…… “. Anda akan mendapat jawapan kepada tuduhan-tuduhan yang telah dilemparkan keatas saya dalam komentar anda.

    Saya tidak mengampu ataupun menafikan dosa sesiapapun, saya hanya menyatakan pendirian saya bahawa seseorang itu tidak bersalah selagi tidak dibuktikan bersalah.

    Akuan bersumpah bukan bukti yang mutlak.. Uncrowded perlu rujuk press statement Mr Americk Singh Sindhu peguam kepada Balasubramaniam.. saya petik kata-kata beliau..

    “…what Bala has stated in his SD is not the statement of the truth. It is a statement of what was said to him (by Razak Baginda and Altantuya). So he’s not saying what he heard is absolute gospel truth. I think you (reporters) must distinguish between these two features…”

    Maka, atas apa yang Bala dengar, diberitahu dan lihat kenyataan bersumpah ini dibuat. Biarlah mahkamah yang buktikan kesahihan apa yang Bala dengar,lihat dan diberitahu dahulu barulah kita kata Najib (atau Rosmah) bersalah.

    Uncrowded, cuba bayangkan anda yang dituduh, tentunya anda akan menafikan tuduhan sehinggalah hakim menjatuhkan hukuman keatas anda.

    Saya berniat untuk memupuk budaya dan amalan sihat yang seharusnya dipraktikkan oleh setiap Masyarakat Malaysia. Sistem kehakiman seharusnya dipatuhi, kebergantungan kepada mahkamah rakyat bakal mewujudkan anarki dalam masyarakat, dan yang paling penting hak seseorang manusia dan warganegara adalah mendapat keadilan dan perbicaraan yang adil serta tidak berpihak di mahkamah.

    Terima kasih, walaupun otak saya dilutut, beza antara kita adalah, saya menggunakan otak saya!

  9. to the anwar fanatics, don’t be too blind. anwar is nothing more than a machiavellian politician out to grab power at all costs. he may be able to deceice the unthinking supporters like you but not us. and before you start accusing i’m defending najib, i’m not BN or najib supporter.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s